IWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcase
I was among the first one to show you the IWCAquatimer novelties. Today I photographed the watches under much better conditions and I invite you to rediscover the entire collection.
I am sure you have already seen the IWC Aquatimer watches 2014 on my blog. I took these pictures in the Sultanate of Oman end of October under not ideal light conditions. I was happy to have these shots, but one can do much better of course…
If you need technical data or short descriptions to the Aquatimer´s shown please click HERE and HERE
I hope you like these photos taken today here at the SIHH in Geneva
IWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin” …
IWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcaseIWC Aquatimer Chronograph Edition “Expedition Charles Darwin”. For the first time ever, IWC makes use of bronze for a watchcase
Alex, I’ve asked for your help back in January to get to know a plethora of data about the IWC AT ref. 3768 in this thread (see under). You wrote that you needed some time to get all the info from IWC. I’ve written just to remind you, as after the SIHH and around Baselworld you could have a lot to do, more than enough to keep this one in mind. Thanks in advance! Please read this thread!
Best regards from beautiful Budapest:
Robert
says:Robert
Sorry, forgot to ask lug-to-lug distance 🙁 (in case of the previous AT Chrono ref. 3767 it is 52 mm, I wonder if the 3768 is longer or not).
Thanks again!
Robert
says:Robert
Alex, thx for the wonderful pictures!
Regarding to questions, if you have chance to ask:
1. Will the new 7750-based chronographs 3768 steel bracelet finally get the new IWC micro-adjust folding clasp? At least by the time serial production begins… (On the scan there is the clasp of the 3767, which is a big no-go in case of this heavy watch!
2. As we see at the RG QP AT IWC has the know-how of production of the rubber strap with nice alligator inlay – is there a chance that the 3768 will also have a similar option? Possibly with a folding clasp…
3. Is there a chance that the “normal” rubber strap of the 3768 will also come with a folding clasp?
4. Is it possible to take the exact data of the 3768 on bracelet?
a. case diameter (officially 44 but may slightly differ)
b. bezel outer part diameter (45.5 mm on the 3767, this one looks a tad larger)
c. exact case height bot up to the steel part of bezel and up to the center of the domed crystal
d. total weight of the watch on steel bracelet
It would be a huuuuuuuge help if you could have these infos!
I wonder if still no data available yet?
What data?
Alex, I’ve asked for your help back in January to get to know a plethora of data about the IWC AT ref. 3768 in this thread (see under). You wrote that you needed some time to get all the info from IWC. I’ve written just to remind you, as after the SIHH and around Baselworld you could have a lot to do, more than enough to keep this one in mind. Thanks in advance! Please read this thread!
Best regards from beautiful Budapest:
Robert
Sorry, forgot to ask lug-to-lug distance 🙁 (in case of the previous AT Chrono ref. 3767 it is 52 mm, I wonder if the 3768 is longer or not).
Thanks again!
Robert
Alex, thx for the wonderful pictures!
Regarding to questions, if you have chance to ask:
1. Will the new 7750-based chronographs 3768 steel bracelet finally get the new IWC micro-adjust folding clasp? At least by the time serial production begins… (On the scan there is the clasp of the 3767, which is a big no-go in case of this heavy watch!
2. As we see at the RG QP AT IWC has the know-how of production of the rubber strap with nice alligator inlay – is there a chance that the 3768 will also have a similar option? Possibly with a folding clasp…
3. Is there a chance that the “normal” rubber strap of the 3768 will also come with a folding clasp?
4. Is it possible to take the exact data of the 3768 on bracelet?
a. case diameter (officially 44 but may slightly differ)
b. bezel outer part diameter (45.5 mm on the 3767, this one looks a tad larger)
c. exact case height bot up to the steel part of bezel and up to the center of the domed crystal
d. total weight of the watch on steel bracelet
It would be a huuuuuuuge help if you could have these infos!
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best regards,
Robert
A lot of questions… You have to give me some time to get the answers
Of course, no urgency at all 🙂 thank you for looking after the things!
Regards,
Robert
Alex, did you have a chance to get access to these data yet?
Thx a lot,
Robert
Thanks a lot for the fine reports and the fabulous pictures that you have been posting daily!
These IWC watches are just awesome!!!
Aquatimer Automatic about 6.500 USD, AT2000 about 11.000 USD.
I love the IWC Aquatimer Automatic & the IWC Aquatimer Automatic 2000, any idea on price for either of these?
I will answer you this question after the SIHH, please give me another few days of time
Thanks for the additional pics, Alex. Your diligence is always appreciated.